Lesson 57 — Linear Approximation and Differentials
Tangent line as local approximation. Differential dy. Error estimation via second derivative. Newton-Raphson as iterated linearization.
Used in: 2nd Year of Program (Calculus I) · Equivalent Japanese Math III §4 · Equivalent German Leistungskurs Differentialrechnung · Singapore H2 Math §4.3
Linearization of f at point a: the tangent line to the graph at is the best linear approximation of f near a. The error is — it shrinks much faster than the distance to the base point.
Rigorous notation, full derivation, hypotheses
Rigorous Definition and Error Theory
Linearization
"If is differentiable at , then is called the linearization of at . The approximation is called the linear approximation or tangent line approximation of at ." — OpenStax Calculus Vol.1 §4.2
Differential
"We define and as real variables so that the following equation holds: . The differential is a linear approximation of the actual change ." — OpenStax Calculus Vol.1 §4.2
Error Estimation via Taylor
Figure: Tangent Line as Local Approximation
The tangent line touches the graph of at . The error (orange segment) between the curve and the line grows with the square of the distance .
Classic Approximations at (Linear Maclaurin Series)
| at | Valid for | |
|---|---|---|
| small | ||
| in radians, small | ||
| small | ||
| small | ||
| small | ||
| small | ||
| small | ||
| small |
Error Propagation
For with uncertainty in :
For functions of several variables with independent errors :
Solved Examples
Exercise list
40 exercises · 10 with worked solution (25%)
- Ex. 57.1
Approximate using linearization at .
Show solution
For at : , . Thus .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Identify the function and base point. , . We choose because is exact.
- Calculate the derivative at a. , so .
- Write the linearization. .
- Evaluate at x = 4.1. .
Rule of thumb: the actual error is ; the linearization error is only 0.00015 — less than 0.01%.
- Ex. 57.2
Approximate using linearization at . Compare with the actual value.
Show solution
, . . . Actual value: . - Ex. 57.3
Approximate using linearization at .
Show solution
, . . . Then . Actual value: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Base point. because and are trivial.
- Derivative at a. , .
- Linearization. . The approximation is fundamental in physics (small oscillations).
- Evaluation. . Error: .
Rule of thumb: is valid for up to about 0.17 rad (10°) with less than 0.5% error.
- Ex. 57.4Answer key
Approximate using linearization at . Explain why the result is surprisingly inaccurate.
Show solution
, . . . Then . Actual value: . The 1st-order error is zero here: , so the linearization is constant and we need 2nd-order Taylor to improve. - Ex. 57.5
Approximate using linearization at .
Show solution
, . , . . . Actual value: . - Ex. 57.6
Approximate using linearization at .
Show solution
, . , . . . Actual value: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Base point. because is exact and simple.
- Derivative at a. , .
- Linearization. . Equivalently: for small .
- Evaluation. . Error: , or 2.5% error.
Rule of thumb: the formula is widely used in finance to convert compound rates to simple rates when is small.
- Ex. 57.7
Approximate using the linearization of at .
Show solution
, . . . . Actual value: — 1.6% error. - Ex. 57.8
Approximate using linearization at .
Show solution
, . , . . Actual value: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Base point. because is an exact perfect cube.
- Derivative at a. , .
- Linearization. .
- Evaluation. .
Curiosity: Newton used this type of calculation to compute roots without a calculator. The method was published in Arithmetica Universalis (1707).
- Ex. 57.9
Write the linearization of at . This linearization is identical to that of at — why?
Show solution
, . , , . Linearization: . - Ex. 57.10
Write the linearization of at .
Show solution
, . , , . Linearization: . - Ex. 57.11
Write the linearization of at .
Show solution
, . . Product rule: . . Linearization: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Evaluate f at a = 0. .
- Calculate f'(x) using the product rule. .
- Evaluate f'(0). .
- Write L(x). .
Note: even though it's a complex product, the linearization is simple — near zero — because both factors have simple linearizations that multiply like for small .
- Ex. 57.12
Approximate using linearization at .
Show solution
, . , . . Actual value: . - Ex. 57.13
Calculate the differential for at , . Compare with the actual change .
Show solution
. . At , : . Actual change: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Write the differential. . The differential is the derivative times the change in x.
- Substitute the values. , : .
- Confirm with the actual change. . Difference: . Less than 0.5%.
Rule of thumb: the differential is always a first-order approximation — it ignores all terms of order 2 in . The difference between and is precisely these higher-order terms.
- Ex. 57.14
Calculate the differential for at , .
Show solution
. . At , : . Actual value: . - Ex. 57.15
Approximate using the linearization of at . Use and .
Show solution
, (30°). . Difference: rad. . Actual value: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Convert angles to radians. , .
- Calculate x - a. rad.
- Derivative at a. .
- Linearization. .
Rule of thumb: when linearizing trigonometric functions at angles given in degrees, ALWAYS convert to radians before applying the derivative. Degrees do not work with the standard derivatives.
- Ex. 57.16Answer key
Approximate using the linearization of at .
Show solution
, (60°). , . Difference: . . - Ex. 57.17
What is the linearization of at ?
Show solution
, . , , . . Distractor B ignores the 1/2 factor in the derivative. Distractor C gets the sign wrong. Distractor D forgets the value at a = 0. - Ex. 57.18
Approximate using linearization at .
Show solution
, . , , . . - Ex. 57.19
Write the linearization of at .
Show solution
, . , . . - Ex. 57.20
Calculate the absolute error of the linearization of at by comparing with . Verify that the error is within the bound .
Show solution
Absolute error of the linearization of : . Theoretical bound: where . Bound: . Actual error is within the bound. - Ex. 57.21Answer key
Perform one iteration of Newton-Raphson to find , starting from .
Show solution
, . With : . Actual value: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Rephrase the problem. Finding is equivalent to solving . Define , .
- Apply Newton-Raphson. .
- Evaluate the error. . Starting from 0, we already have 2 correct digits in 1 iteration.
Rule of thumb: convergence is quadratic — in the next iteration the error would be , giving another 2 decimal places for free.
- Ex. 57.22Answer key
Perform two iterations of Newton-Raphson to solve with .
Show solution
, . . . . Actual: . - Ex. 57.23
A sphere has radius cm. Estimate the maximum error in the volume using the differential.
Show solution
. . With , : cm³. Relative error: .Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Differential of volume. . Note that is the surface area of the sphere — it makes geometric sense.
- Substitute values. cm, cm: cm³.
- Calculate relative error. cm³. Relative error: .
Curiosity: the relative error in volume is 3 times the relative error in radius — a direct consequence of . General rule: for , the relative error in is times the relative error in .
- Ex. 57.24Answer key
The period of a pendulum is . If the length has a relative error of , what is the relative error in ?
Show solution
. . A relative error in of 1% results in . The error in the period is half the error in the length.Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Write T as a power of L. . The exponent of is .
- Relative error rule. For , the relative error in is times the relative error in .
- Apply. .
Rule of thumb: the exponent appears as a multiplicative factor for relative errors. For a square root (exponent 1/2), the relative error is halved. For squaring (exponent 2), the relative error doubles.
- Ex. 57.25Answer key
For with independent errors and , write the error propagation formula for using partial derivatives.
Show solution
. , . , so . The formula propagates errors quadratically for independent errors. - Ex. 57.26
The area of a circle is with cm. Estimate the maximum error in using the differential.
Show solution
. . With , (since ): cm². - Ex. 57.27
Why is the linearization error said to be ? What theorem supports this?
Show solution
From Taylor's theorem with remainder: . The error grows with the square of the distance to the base point. Distractor B confuses it with the growth of the linearization itself. Distractors C and D have no basis in Taylor's theorem.Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Write Taylor with remainder. for some between and .
- Identify the error. . The term is quadratic in .
- Interpret. If is halved, the error drops by a factor of 4. If it doubles, the error quadruples.
Rule of thumb: "2nd order" means the exponent of in the error is 2 — this is why linearization is so useful for small distances but fails for large ones.
- Ex. 57.28
Under what circumstance is the linearization of at particularly inaccurate, even for close to ? What should be done in such cases?
Show solution
When , the linearization is constant. The behavior of near is dominated by curvature (), not slope. Linearization is unnecessarily inaccurate at these points — use 2nd-order Taylor: . - Ex. 57.29
Show that is the linearization of at . For what values of (in radians) is the error less than 1%?
Show solution
, : . Linearization: . The approximation has less than 1% error for rad (about 10°). The error bound is ; for 1% of , solve , i.e., — but the practical engineering criterion is up to 14°. - Ex. 57.30
What is the relationship between (actual change) and (differential)?
Show solution
is the actual change. is the linear change. The difference tends to zero faster than . Distractor B ignores the 2nd-order error. Distractor C is correct for affine functions but the question is about general equality. Distractor D is false: for concave functions . - Ex. 57.31Answer key
Explain where the Newton-Raphson formula comes from in terms of linearization.
Show solution
Newton-Raphson: . Origin: we zero the linearization of at . The tangent line is ; setting to zero: . Each iteration is a local linearization whose zero becomes the next estimate. - Ex. 57.32
Use linearization to approximate .
Show solution
, . . . Actual value: . - Ex. 57.33Answer key
The side of a cube is measured with a relative error of . What is the relative error in the volume ?
Show solution
. . Relative error in : . The exponent 3 appears as a multiplicative factor.Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Differential of volume. .
- Relative error. Divide by : .
- Substitute. .
Rule of thumb: for any , the relative error in is times the relative error in . This follows directly from the power rule applied to the differential.
- Ex. 57.34
Write the linearization of at .
Show solution
, . , . . This is the binomial approximation for exponent . - Ex. 57.35Answer key
Calculate the absolute and relative error of the linearization of at when approximating . Is the result surprising? Explain.
Show solution
See the referenced source for the detailed solution.Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Calculate L(1). ; .
- Actual value. .
- Absolute error. .
- Relative error. . Large: the point is far from .
Note: to improve for , use base point and target — or use a higher-degree Taylor expansion.
- Ex. 57.36
Newton-Raphson fails when . Explain geometrically and give an example function where this occurs.
Show solution
If , the tangent line at is horizontal and never crosses the -axis. Newton-Raphson attempts to divide by : undefined. Example: with root at and . Newton oscillates or diverges in this case — the horizontal tangent provides no directional information. - Ex. 57.37Answer key
Derive the error bound from Taylor's theorem with the Lagrange remainder.
Show solution
See the referenced source for the detailed solution. - Ex. 57.38
Volume of a cylinder: . With cm and cm, estimate the maximum error in using the total differential.
Show solution
. Total differential: . With , , , : cm³.Show step-by-step (with the why)
- Total differential. For functions of two variables: .
- Partial derivatives. , .
- Substitute. cm³.
Rule of thumb: the total differential generalizes the one-dimensional differential to functions of multiple variables — each variable contributes its partial derivative times its change.
- Ex. 57.39
Prove that is the degree 1 Taylor polynomial of at , and that the error is .
Show solution
Full Taylor series: . Truncating at : . Linearization is the degree 1 Taylor polynomial. The error has dominant term . - Ex. 57.40
Prove that Newton-Raphson has quadratic convergence: if is the error at the -th iteration and , then for some constant .
Show solution
Let be the exact root (), . Taylor at : . Newton iteration: . Expanding and simplifying: . Thus with . Quadratic convergence.
Sources
- Active Calculus — Boelkins · 2024 · §1.8 "The tangent line approximation" · CC-BY-NC-SA. Primary source. Exercises 57.1–57.2, 57.5, 57.7, 57.11–57.12, 57.15, 57.20–57.21, 57.27, 57.29, 57.31, 57.35, 57.37, 57.39–57.40.
- Calculus Volume 1 — OpenStax · 2016 · §4.2 "Linear Approximations and Differentials" · CC-BY-NC-SA. Exercises 57.3–57.4, 57.6, 57.13–57.14, 57.17–57.19, 57.23, 57.25, 57.28, 57.30, 57.33.
- APEX Calculus — Hartman et al. · 2024 · v5 · §4.4 "Differentials" · CC-BY-NC. Exercises 57.8–57.10, 57.16, 57.22, 57.24, 57.26, 57.31, 57.34, 57.36, 57.38.